netdev - When a TCP segment is split up (to be sent through a TUN device with a small MTU) who should recalculate the checksum?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5285E0BC.4090402@atlantech.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:52:12 +0100
From:	John Hughes <john@...antech.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: When a TCP segment is split up (to be sent through a TUN device with
 a small MTU) who should recalculate the checksum?

I have two offices, joined by a OpenVPN tunnel.  I've upgraded the 
kernels in the machines running the tunnel to 3.10.  All of a sudden I'm 
getting horrible transmission delays between the two offices.

office1 LAN--------office1 tunnel machine
                             |
                             | openvpn tunnel
                             |
                     office2 tunnel machine------office2 LAN
                                   

What seems to be happening is that packets are arriving at the LAN 
interface of the machine running the tunnel and being combined by 
generic-receive-offload.  These packets then have to be split up again 
as they are too big for the tunnels MTU.

But when the packets are split the TCP checksum doesn't seem to be being 
recalculated, so the systems on the other end of the tunnel ignore them, 
forcing many retries and the observed delays.

For example, here is a large packet coming in on the NIC of the machine 
running the tunnel, followed by a smaller packet ("caronia" is on the 
office 1 LAN, "olympic" is on the office 2 LAN):

11:59:23.020426 IP caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], seq 3073:9843, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919291 ecr 1199882508], length 6770
11:59:23.041072 IP caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], seq 9843:11197, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919297 ecr 1199882508], length 1354


Then the packet gets sent out on the tunnel as 5 smaller packets:

11:59:23.020449 IP caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], seq 3073:4427, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919291 ecr 1199882508], length 1354
11:59:23.020534 IP caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], seq 4427:5781, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919291 ecr 1199882508], length 1354
11:59:23.020536 IP caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], seq 5781:7135, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919291 ecr 1199882508], length 1354
11:59:23.020539 IP caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], seq 7135:8489, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919291 ecr 1199882508], length 1354
11:59:23.020543 IP caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], seq 8489:9843, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919291 ecr 1199882508], length 1354
11:59:23.041086 IP caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], seq 9843:11197, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919297 ecr 1199882508], length 1354



And this is what the receiving system sees:

11:59:23.025658 IP (tos 0x8, ttl 62, id 42831, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1406)
     caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], cksum 0x1003 (incorrect -> 0xb1b9), seq 3073:4427, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919291 ecr 1199882508], length 1354
11:59:23.025907 IP (tos 0x8, ttl 62, id 42832, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1406)
     caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], cksum 0x1003 (incorrect -> 0x871c), seq 4427:5781, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919291 ecr 1199882508], length 1354
11:59:23.025990 IP (tos 0x8, ttl 62, id 42833, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1406)
     caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], cksum 0x1003 (incorrect -> 0x97dd), seq 5781:7135, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919291 ecr 1199882508], length 1354
11:59:23.026183 IP (tos 0x8, ttl 62, id 42834, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1406)
     caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], cksum 0x1003 (incorrect -> 0x9961), seq 7135:8489, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919291 ecr 1199882508], length 1354
11:59:23.026231 IP (tos 0x8, ttl 62, id 42835, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1406)
     caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], cksum 0x1003 (incorrect -> 0x6a2a), seq 8489:9843, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919291 ecr 1199882508], length 1354
11:59:23.046163 IP (tos 0x8, ttl 62, id 42836, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1406)
     caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232 > olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh: Flags [.], cksum 0xd237 (correct), seq 9843:11197, ack 2233, win 148, options [nop,nop,TS val 215919297 ecr 1199882508], length 1354


The receiving system is, of course, unhappy about that and complains 
that it hasn't got 3073:9843

11:59:23.045040 IP olympic.calvaedi.com.ssh > caronia.CalvaEDI.COM.33232: Flags [.], ack 3073, win 1933, options [nop,nop,TS val 1199882514 ecr 215919290,nop,nop,sack 1 {9843:11197}], length 0


So, when the 6770 byte segment is split up into five 1354 byte segments 
who is supposed to recalculate the checksums?

(This is Debian bug 729567).


-- 
John Hughes, SARL Atlantic Technologies.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html