[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5286CF72.20406@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 09:50:42 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dthxman@...il.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
CC: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: set primary_reselect in LB and AB mode
δΊ 2013/11/16 2:02, Jay Vosburgh ει:
> Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> The primary_reselect only reselection for the primary slave,
>> but the primary slave only support for ALB, TLB and AB mode,
>> so we sould set the primary_reselect for these mode.
>>
>> to fix this: Add a check for ALB, TLB and AB mode in
>> bonding_store_primary_reselect, avoid to select active slave
>> again in other modes.
> I don't believe that setting primary_reselect in a
> !USES_PRIMARY() mode has any negative effects. It doesn't do anything,
> but also doesn't break anything. Is there a case that setting
> primary_reselect causes misbehavior in a !USES_PRIMARY() mode?
I see it will call bond_select_active_slave and I will think more about it,
if I could not find any problem about it, will miss this patch.
thanks.
Regards
Ding
> Presuming that primary_reselect doesn't break things, this just
> adds an ordering limitation when configuring bonding (mode must be set
> prior to primary_reselect). I don't believe this change adds any value,
> and may break existing configuration scripts.
>
> -J
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>> index 47749c9..cac2291 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>> @@ -1141,6 +1141,13 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_primary_reselect(struct device *d,
>> if (!rtnl_trylock())
>> return restart_syscall();
>>
>> + if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) {
>> + pr_info("%s: Unable to set primary reselect; %s is in mode %d\n",
>> + bond->dev->name, bond->dev->name, bond->params.mode);
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> new_value = bond_parse_parm(buf, pri_reselect_tbl);
>> if (new_value < 0) {
>> pr_err("%s: Ignoring invalid primary_reselect value %.*s.\n",
>> --
>> 1.7.12
> ---
> -Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@...ibm.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists