[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1384562417-817-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:40:07 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/14] decnet: Apply ACCESS_ONCE() to avoid sparse false positive
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded
to reject non-__kernel address spaces. This also rejects __rcu,
which is almost always the right thing to do. However, the use in
dn_insert_route() is legitimate: It is assigning a pointer to an element
from an RCU-protected list, and all elements of this list are already
visible to caller.
This commit therefore silences this false positive by laundering the
pointer using ACCESS_ONCE() as suggested by Eric Dumazet and Josh
Triplett.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
net/decnet/dn_route.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_route.c b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
index fe32388ea24f..a6ef8b025035 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_route.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
@@ -344,8 +344,9 @@ static int dn_insert_route(struct dn_route *rt, unsigned int hash, struct dn_rou
if (compare_keys(&rth->fld, &rt->fld)) {
/* Put it first */
*rthp = rth->dst.dn_next;
- rcu_assign_pointer(rth->dst.dn_next,
- dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain);
+ /* Both --rcu and visible, so ACCESS_ONCE() is OK. */
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rth->dst.dn_next) =
+ dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain;
rcu_assign_pointer(dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain, rth);
dst_use(&rth->dst, now);
@@ -358,7 +359,8 @@ static int dn_insert_route(struct dn_route *rt, unsigned int hash, struct dn_rou
rthp = &rth->dst.dn_next;
}
- rcu_assign_pointer(rt->dst.dn_next, dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain);
+ /* Both --rcu and visible, so ACCESS_ONCE() is OK. */
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rt->dst.dn_next) = dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain;
rcu_assign_pointer(dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain, rt);
dst_use(&rt->dst, now);
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists