netdev - Re: [PATCH net RESEND] bonding: don't change to 802.3ad mode while ARP monitoring is running

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:48:38 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dcbw@...hat.com
Cc:	dingtianhong@...wei.com, fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
	nikolay@...hat.com, vfalico@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net RESEND] bonding: don't change to 802.3ad mode while
 ARP monitoring is running

From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:44:42 -0600

> On Sat, 2013-11-16 at 14:30 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Because the ARP monitoring is not support for 802.3ad, but I still
>> could change the mode to 802.3ad from ab mode while ARP monitoring
>> is running, it is incorrect.
>> 
>> So add a check for 802.3ad in bonding_store_mode to fix the problem,
>> and make a new macro BOND_NO_USES_ARP() to simplify the code.
> 
> Instead of failing, couldn't the code stop ARP monitoring and allow the
> mode change?  This is similar to setting miimon, which disables ARP
> monitoring, or setting ARP monitoring, which disables miimon.
> 
> 	if (new_value && bond->params.arp_interval) {
> 		pr_info("%s: MII monitoring cannot be used with ARP monitoring. Disabling ARP monitoring...\n",
> 			bond->dev->name);
> 		bond->params.arp_interval = 0;
> 		if (bond->params.arp_validate)
> 			bond->params.arp_validate = BOND_ARP_VALIDATE_NONE;
> 	}
> 
> Bond mode is the most important bond option, so it seems like it should
> override any of the other sub-options.  I know the code doesn't do this
> now, but maybe instead of the patch you propose, it would be nicer to
> allow the mode change instead?

I agree with Dan, if other mode changes behave this way (by dropping the
incompatible feature) we should make 802.3ad do so as well at the very
least for consistency.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html