netdev - RE: testing and validating 64-bit addressing.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B742C@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:24:44 -0000
From:	"David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	"Rayagond K" <rayagond@...avyalabs.com>,
	"netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: testing and validating 64-bit addressing.

> I have one Ethernet card which supports 64-bit DMA addressing and I
> need to implement this feature and test it.
...
> 3. Installed the 64-bit operating system on 64-bit architecture -
> Fedora 15, 64 bit os , LINUX 3.8.0 kernel, Intel dual core processor,
> 4GB RAM.
...
> 1. Why are we always getting 33-bit address only ?

Because the physical memory is aligned to the bottom of the
physical memory map.
The only reason you see addresses above 4B is that there
is a great big address block (typically from 3G or 3.5G) reserved
for PCI devices.

	David



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html