netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "af-packet: Use existing netdev reference for bound sockets"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131118.202658.118112656342762223.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 18 Nov 2013 20:26:58 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	noureddine@...stanetworks.com
Cc:	dborkman@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com, phil@....cc,
	edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	greearb@...delatech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "af-packet: Use existing netdev reference
 for bound sockets"

From: Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:17:02 -0800

> Thanks for looking into this. It seems to me that just using a flag
> won't help in avoiding the race condition since packet_notifier can
> still run after the flag check.

The bind_lock syncronizes everything.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html