[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131120090627.GE19341@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:06:27 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Michael Dalton <mwdalton@...gle.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
lf-virt <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: fix page refcnt leaking when fail to
allocate frag skb
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:38:16PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote:
> Great catch Jason. I agree this now raises the larger issue of how to
> handle a memory alloc failure in the middle of receive. As Eric mentioned,
> we can drop the packet and free the remaining (num_buf) frags.
>
> Michael, perhaps I'm missing something, but why would you prefer
> pre-allocating buffers in this case? If the guest kernel is OOM'ing,
> dropping packets should provide backpressure.
>
> Also, we could just as easily fail the initial skb alloc in page_to_skb,
> and I think that case also needs to be handled now in the same fashion as
> a memory allocation failure in receive_mergeable.
>
> Best,
>
> Mike
Yes I missed this last night. Thanks a lot Eric and Michael for pointing
this out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists