[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131120162441.GW16541@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:24:41 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net,
thaller@...hat.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
vyasevich@...il.com, dcbw@...hat.com, David.Laight@...LAB.COM
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC v2 2/2] ipv6 addrconf: introduce IFA_F_MANAGETEMPADDR to tell kernel to manage temporary addresses
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:18:38PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:05:43PM CET, hannes@...essinduktion.org wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Creating an address with this flag set will result in kernel taking care
> >> of temporary addresses in the same way as if the address was created by
> >> kernel itself (after RA receive). This allows userspace applications
> >> implementing the autoconfiguration (NetworkManager for example) to
> >> implement ipv6 addresses privacy.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller <thaller@...hat.com>
> >
> >The patch looks good.
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> >
> >The _bh conversion seems not to be strictly necessary, no?
> >ipv6_create_tempaddr is always called with bh disabled.
>
> It is needed. Found out using lock debug config option.
Yes, I can see it now, too. ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists