netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] packet: fix use after free race in send path when dev is released

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1385044842.10637.41.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Nov 2013 06:40:42 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] packet: fix use after free race in send path
 when dev is released

On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 10:47 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:

> +static void packet_dev_put_deferred(struct rcu_head *head)
> +{
> +	struct packet_sock *po = container_of(head, struct packet_sock, rcu);
> +	struct sock *sk = &po->sk;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&po->bind_lock);
> +	po->ifindex = -1;
> +
> +	if (po->prot_hook.dev) {
> +		dev_put(po->prot_hook.dev);
> +		po->prot_hook.dev = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);
> +	sock_put(sk);
> +}

I dont think this is needed.

>  
>  static int packet_notifier(struct notifier_block *this,
>  			   unsigned long msg, void *ptr)
> @@ -3325,13 +3354,13 @@ static int packet_notifier(struct notifier_block *this,
>  					if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
>  						sk->sk_error_report(sk);
>  				}
> +				spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);
> +
>  				if (msg == NETDEV_UNREGISTER) {
> -					po->ifindex = -1;
> -					if (po->prot_hook.dev)
> -						dev_put(po->prot_hook.dev);
> -					po->prot_hook.dev = NULL;
> +					sock_hold(sk);
> +					call_rcu(&po->rcu,
> +						 packet_dev_put_deferred);
>  				}
> -				spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);
>  			}

Its not needed because you now take a reference on dev
in packet_cached_dev_get()

Otherwise, patch looks good !


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html