netdev - Re: [Doubt on Implict BUGs caused LRO] doubt about lro status in v3.12 of torvalds/linux.git

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJULongp1k_njwa6gQ=RD2HzLbbGkE2r+8LADNBOiz9Dwb5fxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Nov 2013 00:59:53 +0800
From:	Yanfei Wang <backyes@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Doubt on Implict BUGs caused LRO] doubt about lro status in
 v3.12 of torvalds/linux.git

Hi，Eric&all,

I figure out I must have encountered some issues from git db usage,
even though I have not completely understood what happened on git, and
I will try to figure out what happened in reality.

so ignore all doubts in this email, please.

I am so sorry !

--
Yanfei Wang

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Yanfei Wang <backyes@...l.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Thanks for quick reply.  :-)
>
> Also, I am confused that in v3.12 why inet_lro.c file is not found in
> /net/ipv4/ directory, while Makefile has "obj-$(CONFIG_INET_LRO) +=
> inet_lro.o" and LRO heads file exsits.
>
> If I am wrong, pls correct me, :-)
>
>  See the steps 3 for details,(I have repeated it for several times)
> ----
> 3. cd net/ipv4,
>  [backyes@f14 ipv4]$ cat Makefile | grep lro
> obj-$(CONFIG_INET_LRO) += inet_lro.o
> [backyes@f14 ipv4]$ ls inet_*
> inet_connection_sock.c  inet_diag.c  inet_fragment.c
> inet_hashtables.c  inet_timewait_sock.c
> ---
>
> Best regards
>
> Yanfei Wang
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 23:00 +0800, Yanfei Wang wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Compared to the earlier kernel version, I found that Large receive
>>> offload(LRO) is obsolete in latest kernel, and that is verified from
>>> other materials about Generic receive offload(GRO).
>>>
>>> However,  I also found some LRO header files and  lro-related
>>> functions referred by some drivers, and the lro-related function
>>> definition is already removed at the same time!
>>>
>>> TEST steps:
>>> 1. my git local db config as follow, url =
>>> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>>> 2. git checkout v3.12 -b 3.12
>>> 3. cd net/ipv4,
>>>  [backyes@f14 ipv4]$ cat Makefile | grep lro
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_INET_LRO) += inet_lro.o
>>> [backyes@f14 ipv4]$ ls inet_*
>>> inet_connection_sock.c  inet_diag.c  inet_fragment.c
>>> inet_hashtables.c  inet_timewait_sock.c
>>> [backyes@f14 ipv4]$
>>> Here, Makefile has inet_lro.o config, while the inet_lro.c is removed.
>>> 4. lro functions referred by some drivers, as follow,
>>> [backyes@f14 linux]$ grep "inet_lro" * -r
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/pasemi/pasemi_mac.c:#include <linux/inet_lro.h>
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/pasemi/pasemi_mac_ethtool.c:#include <linux/inet_lro.h>
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/nes_hw.c:#include <linux/inet_lro.h>
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/nes_hw.h:#include <linux/inet_lro.h>
>>> include/linux/inet_lro.h: *  linux/include/linux/inet_lro.h
>>> net/ipv4/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_INET_LRO) += inet_lro.o
>>>
>>> so, I understand that the removal of LRO is not clean, which will
>>> cause compiler error for some kernel config.
>>>
>>
>> I think you are slightly confused.
>>
>> LRO is not yet removed.
>>
>> Feel free to contribute ;)
>>
>> As long as at least one driver still uses LRO, we can not remove LRO.
>>
>> Converting a driver means testing the new driver, and owning the
>> hardware.
>>
>>
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html