[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1385342706.10637.125.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:25:06 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, shawnlandden@...il.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pipe_to_sendpage: Ensure that MSG_MORE is set if we set
MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 00:42 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Commit 35f9c09fe (tcp: tcp_sendpages() should call tcp_push() once)
> added an internal flag MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST.
> We have to ensure that MSG_MORE is also set if we set MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST.
> Otherwise users that check against MSG_MORE will not see it.
>
> This fixes sendfile() on AF_ALG.
>
> Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.4.x
> Reported-and-tested-by: Shawn Landden <shawnlandden@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> ---
> fs/splice.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c
> index 3b7ee65..b93f1b8 100644
> --- a/fs/splice.c
> +++ b/fs/splice.c
> @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static int pipe_to_sendpage(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> more = (sd->flags & SPLICE_F_MORE) ? MSG_MORE : 0;
>
> if (sd->len < sd->total_len && pipe->nrbufs > 1)
> - more |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST;
> + more |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST | MSG_MORE;
>
> return file->f_op->sendpage(file, buf->page, buf->offset,
> sd->len, &pos, more);
I do not think this patch is right. It looks like a revert of a useful
patch for TCP zero copy. Given the time it took to discover this
regression, I bet tcp zero copy has more users than AF_ALG, by 5 or 6
order of magnitude ;)
Here we want to make the difference between the two flags, not merge
them.
If AF_ALG do not care of the difference, try instead :
diff --git a/crypto/algif_hash.c b/crypto/algif_hash.c
index ef5356cd280a..850246206b12 100644
--- a/crypto/algif_hash.c
+++ b/crypto/algif_hash.c
@@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ static ssize_t hash_sendpage(struct socket *sock, struct page *page,
struct hash_ctx *ctx = ask->private;
int err;
+ if (flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)
+ flags |= MSG_MORE;
+
lock_sock(sk);
sg_init_table(ctx->sgl.sg, 1);
sg_set_page(ctx->sgl.sg, page, size, offset);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists