[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEP_g=8nADwqAJ81gtpJ-6v2XW4Se+OK1RPcEZ7mh-_PAwyo7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:40:25 -0800
From: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>, ffusco@...hat.com,
fleitner@...hat.com, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/8] openvswitch: Drop user features if old user
space attempted to create datapath
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> index 07ef2c3..a6863e2 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> @@ -40,7 +40,15 @@ struct ovs_header {
>
> #define OVS_DATAPATH_FAMILY "ovs_datapath"
> #define OVS_DATAPATH_MCGROUP "ovs_datapath"
> -#define OVS_DATAPATH_VERSION 0x1
> +
> +/* V2:
> + * - API users are expected to provide OVS_DP_ATTR_USER_FEATURES
> + * with NLM_F_REPLACE when creating the datapath.
> + */
> +#define OVS_DATAPATH_VERSION 2
I'm not sure that I understand this comment - I guess it means that
there's no legacy path when using NLM_F_REPLACE?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists