[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131129110822.6e4cf256@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:08:22 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should skb->csum include 8021Q header for
CHECKSUM_COMPLETE && NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:28:19 +0000
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Given CHECKSUM_COMPLETE, is skb->csum supposed to include the
> checksum of the VLAN header if the header was stripped by the
> NIC?
>
> The answer is clear for non accelerated VLAN: it covers all of
> the packet without ethernet CRC.
>
> For the accelerated path the answer is less clear after staring
> at drivers. The stack currently only fixes the csum for the
> software path.
>
> We are seeing hw csum failure warnings for drivers like enic if
> OVS pops a VLAN header that was previously stripped in hardware.
> Should we force CHECKSUM_NONE like VXLAN does or are all drivers
> guaranteed to include VLAN bits for CHECK_COMPLETE regardless of
> acceleration?
>
> Best,
> Thomas
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Most hardware is smart enough that if it strips the VLAN header,
it does not include it in the checksum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists