netdev - Re: r8169 - it's dead jim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131130221801.GA19790@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date:	Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:18:01 +0100
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	james@...ealm.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: r8169 - it's dead jim

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> :
[...]
> Francois should I apply this or are you just posting this to get
> testing feedback?

No, it's only debuging help and testing feedback straight from
format-patch.

If I don't send fixes as "[PATCH net x/y] r8169: ..." or features as
"[PATCH net-next 1/1] r8169: perform Tx completion before Rx processing"
during the net-next window in self-contained messages, you should
consider that nothing is expected to be applied and something is probably
going wrong.

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html