[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <529A7955.9010507@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 07:48:37 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
rkuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mac80211: tx.c: be sure of 'sdata->vif.type' must
be NL80211_IFTYPE_AP when be in NL80211_IFTYPE_AP case
On 12/01/2013 04:39 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 21:08 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 22:02 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> - fall-through is obvious (although I did not notice it, originally).
>>>
>>> - Check 'A' again just near by "case A" seems a little strange.
>>>
>>> - Some compilers aren't quit smart enough to know 'chanctx_conf' is OK.
>>
>> I know. If you have any good ideas of how to make it more obvious to the
>> compiler, I'm all ears, I just don't like any of the solutions offered
>> so far (and you aren't the first to do so either) :-)
>>
OK, thanks.
>> FWIW, I find the label to be odd because if you're familiar with the
>> code then AP/AP_VLAN *should* be identical except for two special things
>> that are now linearly & neatly handled in the code (the first being the
>> 4-addr station, the second the chanctx assignment which always has to be
>> done regardless of 4-addr). IMHO the == check after case should be
>> enough to make a human reader take a closer look. I understand that you
>> didn't and that's OK since you were just trying to squelch compile
>> warnings, but I don't see that this one warrants much attention.
>
> The label/test could be moved to save a couple of lines
> of duplicated code.
>
Hmm... for me, it must be an implementation which can satisfy all of us.
If ieee80211_subif_start_xmit() is not performance sensitive (I guess
so), we can use some short static functions instead of some code blocks
within ieee80211_subif_start_xmit().
- ieee80211_subif_start_xmit() is a long function (600+ lines).
- use short static function can share some code.
- if code can be shared, the work flow can be more clearer too (don't
need fall-through or goto).
And I guess, the implementation below can cause panic when
"sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN". :-(
> Maybe:
>
> net/mac80211/tx.c | 14 ++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/tx.c b/net/mac80211/tx.c
> index 70b5a05..b2160f4 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/tx.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c
> @@ -1777,18 +1777,16 @@ netdev_tx_t ieee80211_subif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
> ap_sdata = container_of(sdata->bss, struct ieee80211_sub_if_data,
> u.ap);
> - chanctx_conf = rcu_dereference(ap_sdata->vif.chanctx_conf);
> - if (!chanctx_conf)
> - goto fail_rcu;
> - band = chanctx_conf->def.chan->band;
> - if (sta)
> - break;
> /* fall through */
> case NL80211_IFTYPE_AP:
> - if (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP)
> - chanctx_conf = rcu_dereference(sdata->vif.chanctx_conf);
> + chanctx_conf = rcu_dereference(ap_sdata->vif.chanctx_conf);
> if (!chanctx_conf)
> goto fail_rcu;
> + if (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN) {
> + band = chanctx_conf->def.chan->band;
> + if (sta)
> + break;
> + }
> fc |= cpu_to_le16(IEEE80211_FCTL_FROMDS);
> /* DA BSSID SA */
> memcpy(hdr.addr1, skb->data, ETH_ALEN);
>
>
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists