netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/4] net_sched: actions - Add default lookup and walker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:27:52 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jhs@...atatu.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net_sched: actions - Add default lookup and walker

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Date: Sun,  1 Dec 2013 17:30:05 -0500

> This set of patches provide defaults for lookup and walkers for actions.
> Users can override when needed.
> 
> Jamal Hadi Salim (4):
>   Provide default lookup function for actions that dont provide one
>   Use default lookup functions. Users are free to override when needed.
>   Provide default walker function for actions that dont provide one
>   Use default walker functions. Users who need something special can
>     override.

Ok, but can you respin this set, adding in changes to remove
the code that checks for NULL in these operations?

Specifically, we still have:

	if (a->ops->lookup == NULL)
		goto err_mod;

in tcf_action_get_1().  And:

	if (a_o->walk == NULL) {

in tc_dump_action().

Furthermore, there is a hard assumption that a_o->init() is non-NULL
as well.  So maybe add a:

	if (!act->init)
		return -EINVAL;

at the top of tcf_register_action().

It also occurred to me that it would be simpler to audit and be a
simpler patch set to review if you just added the missing ".lookup ="
assignments to the actions and added a similar "if (!act->lookup)" et
al. check to tcf_register_action().

That looks more like a rigorous requirement to have a valid method
present for these three operations: init, lookup, walk.

What do you think?

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html