netdev - Re: [PATCH] ipv6: ip6_pkt_prohibit(_out) should not depend on CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP8BHkHqNbyEjTUZiKdJ+qz7USGy39t-15b55VfzCu88rnZpjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Dec 2013 19:58:41 +0530
From:	Kamala R <kamala@...stanetworks.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Kamala R <kamala@...stanetworks.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: ip6_pkt_prohibit(_out) should not depend on CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES

Hi,

I have submitted a version 4 of my patch that squashes the above
changes into it as well. Is that the right way to do it ?

Regards,
Kamala

On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:51:10PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
>> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:46:35 +0100
>>
>> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 04:39:30PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> >> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
>> >> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 20:04:11 +0100
>> >>
>> >> > Since patch "IPv6: Fixed support for blackhole and prohibit routes" we
>> >> > need ip6_pkt_prohibit(_out) available without CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES
>> >> > defined.
>> >> >
>> >> > Cc: Kamala R <kamala@...stanetworks.com>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
>> >>
>> >> Please reference the SHA1 ID of the change as well as it's commit
>> >> header text, thank you.
>> >
>> > This patch is a follow-up patch for the first one in this thread which is not
>> > committed, yet. Either Kamala can squash them into one or I'll repost it
>> > later.
>>
>> I think they need to be combined, otherwise bisection is broken.
>
> Kamala, as your patch is the main one, can you squash my patch into yours?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html