[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9BBC4E0CF881AA4299206E2E1412B6264FA00871@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:55:23 +0000
From: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
"Ben Hutchings (bhutchings@...arflare.com)"
<bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: RE: [net 1/8] igb: Update queue reinit function to call dev_close
when init of queues fails
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 12:48 PM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> Cc: Wyborny, Carolyn; netdev@...r.kernel.org; gospo@...hat.com;
> sassmann@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [net 1/8] igb: Update queue reinit function to call dev_close when
> init of queues fails
>
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 23:35:55 -0800
>
> > From: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
> >
> > This patch adds a call to dev_close if the queue reinit fails in order
> > to make clearer to the user that the device is down.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
> > Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>
> This is a very bad approach to this problem.
>
> Users absolutely do not expect their entire interface to go down simply because
> an ethtool request cannot be satisfied. This is extremely poor quality of
> implementation.
>
> And in this specific case it absolutely is not necessary.
>
> The only thing that can fail is the queue allocation, so make a function which can
> preserve the previous configuration if the queue allocation fails. How about
> "igb_reinit_interrupt_scheme".
>
> Don't free the q vectors until the very last moment, when you know that the
> allocation of the new q vectors has succeeded.
>
> I'm not applying this patch, it needs to be reimplemented more sanely, using the
> above suggestions or similar.
>
I did this per Ben's suggestion on Laura's original patch. You didn't argue with it at the time. I don't think I misunderstood his suggestion, but if so, I'll rework it.
Carolyn
Carolyn Wyborny
Linux Development
Networking Division
Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists