[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131203194707.GA32367@lion.mk-sys.cz>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 20:47:07 +0100
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Cc: Kevin Wallace <kevin@...tabarf.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] macvlan: Support creating macvtaps from macvlans
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:17:37AM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/macvlan.c b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
> > index acf9379..cfb9157 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/macvlan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
> > @@ -820,13 +820,11 @@ int macvlan_common_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
> > if (lowerdev == NULL)
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > - /* When creating macvlans on top of other macvlans - use
> > + /* When creating macvlans or macvtaps on top of other macvlans - use
> > * the real device as the lowerdev.
> > */
> > - if (lowerdev->rtnl_link_ops == dev->rtnl_link_ops) {
> > - struct macvlan_dev *lowervlan = netdev_priv(lowerdev);
> > - lowerdev = lowervlan->lowerdev;
> > - }
> > + if (netif_is_macvlan(lowerdev))
> > + lowerdev = macvlan_dev_real_dev(lowerdev);
> >
> > if (!tb[IFLA_MTU])
> > dev->mtu = lowerdev->mtu;
> >
>
> the other question is should this be done in a loop? What happens if
> you have nested namespaces?
Nested namespaces are not a problem, what would be a problem, would be
having a macvlan (macvtap) device on top of another macvlan. But the
purpose of this particular code is to prevent it and use the underlying
"real" device instead. That's why unlike vlan_dev_real_dev(),
macvlan_dev_real_dev() doesn't need to recurse.
Michal Kubecek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists