[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1386189718.30495.131.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:41:58 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@...rix.com>,
Jonathan Davies <Jonathan.Davies@...citrix.com>,
Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: NAPI rescheduling and the delay caused by it
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 18:55 +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> So, my questions are:
> - why is NAPI rescheduled on an another CPU?
> - why does it cause a 3-4 milisec delay?
NAPI can not be scheduled on another cpu.
But at the time of napi_schedule() call, napi_struct can be already be
scheduled by another cpu.
( NAPI_STATE_SCHED bit already set)
So I would say something made the 'other' cpu non responsive fast enough
to softirq events being ready for service.
(Another wakeup happened 3-4 millisec later)
Really, I suspect your usage of netif_wake_queue() is simply wrong.
Check why we have netif_rx() and netif_rx_ni() variants.
And ask yourself if xenvif_notify_tx_completion() is correct, being
called from process context.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists