lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:23:51 +0800
From:	Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	Wang Weidong <weidong1991.wang@...il.com>
CC:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sctp: check the rto_min and rto_max

On 2013/12/6 0:25, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 12/05/2013 03:07 PM, Wang Weidong wrote:
>> From: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
>> On 2013/12/5 21:32, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:19:25AM +0800, Wang Weidong wrote:
>>>> rto_min should be smaller than rto_max while rto_max should be larger
>>>> than rto_min. Add two proc_handler for the checking. Add the check in
>>>> sctp_setsockopt_rtoinfo.
>>>> delete a blank line in proc_sctp_do_hmac_alg() declaration.
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   net/sctp/socket.c |  5 ++++
>>>>   net/sctp/sysctl.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>   2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
>>>> index 72046b9..2e1af1b 100644
>>>> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
>>>> @@ -2818,6 +2818,11 @@ static int sctp_setsockopt_rtoinfo(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval, unsigne
>>>>       if (copy_from_user(&rtoinfo, optval, optlen))
>>>>           return -EFAULT;
>>>>
>>>> +    if (rtoinfo.srto_min < 1 ||
>>>> +        rtoinfo.srto_max > 86400000 ||
>>> These should be defiend to some descriptive value.
>>>
>> Thanks for your suggestion. I will fix it in v5.
> 
> While you're on v5 anyway, please also fix up spacing in your
> commit from ...
> 
> static int proc_sctp_do_rto_min(struct ctl_table *ctl,
>                 int write,
>                 void __user*buffer, size_t *lenp,
>                 loff_t *ppos)
> 
> ... to something like ...
> 
> static int proc_sctp_do_rto_min(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
>                 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
>                 loff_t *ppos)
> 
> Thanks !

Hm, I do it for according to the proc_sctp_do_hmac_alg which is in the same file.
If I fix this, I think it is better to fix the proc_sctp_do_hmac_alg as well. 
Should I do it a patch or another patch?

Thanks!

> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ