netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] xfrm: clamp down spi range for IPComp when allocating spi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:57:03 +0100
From:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:	Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] xfrm: clamp down spi range for IPComp when
 allocating spi

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 02:27:43PM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
> On 2013年12月06日 19:42, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >
> >Also, the spi range is user defined, we should respect the
> >users configuration if the range is valid.
> 
> Ok, then, speaking of respect user defined range, how about below informal
> patch which only check the validity of the range? My original thoughts is CPI
> is only 16bits wide, kernel itself can keep the CPI's validity. btw, v2 will
> also fix patch1/3 align issue.
> 
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> index 6a9c402..2c6fb99 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> @@ -1507,6 +1507,9 @@ int xfrm_alloc_spi(struct xfrm_state *x, u32 low, u32 high)
> 
>         err = -ENOENT;
> 
> +       if ((x->id.proto == IPPROTO_COMP) && (high > 0xFFFF))
> +               goto unlock;
> +

This check is already done in verify_userspi_info() if xfrm_alloc_spi()
is called from xfrm_alloc_userspi().

Instead of doing this check here again, we should implement an equivalent
to verify_userspi_info() for pfkey. Then we are sure to have a valid range
in any case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html