netdev - Re: [net-next 01/14] i40e: separate TSYNVALID and TSYNINDX fields in Rx descriptor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1386617638.24480.13.camel@jekeller-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Dec 2013 19:33:58 +0000
From:	"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To:	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC:	Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
	"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 01/14] i40e: separate TSYNVALID and TSYNINDX fields
 in Rx descriptor

On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 13:40 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 23:33 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Jeff Kirsher
> > <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:
> > > From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> > >
> > > In order to get 1588 to work correctly the defines need a bit
> > > of a tweak.
> > >
> > > Change-Id: Ie50ce2a18e1593441f1560411e5a4f51c6d48aaa
> > 
> > Hi Jeff, we also use this token with out internal gerrit system but
> > make sure to strip that before sending upstream, are we OK for
> > upstream commit to carry such tokens from the vendors systems?
> > 
> 
> I asked that question to Dave last week and to summarize the email
> thread, "if there were commit's in Linus's tree with the Change-Id
> information, then we could do something similar".  We originally were
> using "Internal ID:" but since there was some documented use of
> "Change-Id:", we adopted the use.
> 

To confirm, I did the following on Linus' tree:

$git log --grep='^Change-Id:' --oneline | wc -l

I ended up with just over 1000 patches on his tree with the token.

Regards,
Jake

> > 
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> > > Tested-by: Kavindya Deegala <kavindya.s.deegala@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> 
>