netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 01/12] net/mlx4_en: Reuse mapped memory in RX flow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52A6E319.20407@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:47:05 +0200
From:	Amir Vadai <amirv.mellanox@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@...lanox.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/12] net/mlx4_en: Reuse mapped memory in RX
 flow

On 09/12/2013 17:17, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:44 +0200, Amir Vadai wrote:
> 
>> We get optimal performance when rx rings are mapped 1:1 to cpu's - IRQ
>> affinity is set to this CPU, and memory is allocated on the NUMA node
>> close to it (ring->numa_node)
>> In order to do that, we will post a patch soon to use
>> irq_set_affinity_hint() in order to hint the irq balancer. Till this
>> patch is applied, users should set irq affinity through sysfs and
>> disable the irq balancer.
> 
> Point is : You have nothing to do to affine memory allocations.
> 
> The big problem is correct IRQ affinity, which as you said is addressed
> in a different way/patch
> 
> If the IRQ is properly setup, automatically or by irq affinities,
> then memory will be allocated on the right node, its properly done
> by all memory allocators.
> 
> The xxx_alloc_node() variants in the fast path are therefore not needed,
> and not using them avoids catastrophic results if affinities are not
> properly set.
You are right. Will be fixed in V1 too.
We'll use xxx_alloc_node() on the initialization phase, but on the fast
path let the kernel choose the NUMA node.

> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html