netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] wl1251: implement hardware ARP filtering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131210095937.GC9741@unicorn.suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:59:37 +0100
From:	Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
	Luciano Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, freemangordon@....bg,
	aaro.koskinen@....fi, sre@...g0.de, joni.lapilainen@...il.com,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
	David Gnedt <david.gnedt@...izone.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] wl1251: implement hardware ARP filtering

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:29:16AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >  
> > +int wl1251_acx_arp_ip_filter(struct wl1251 *wl, bool enable, __be32 address)
> > +{
> > +	struct wl1251_acx_arp_filter *acx;
> > +	int ret;
> 
> Is it good idea to use be32 for IP address? AFAICT IPv4 addresses
> really don't have edianity. Perhaps u32 is better?

If they are known to be in network byte ordering, they do (as NBO is the
same as BE).

                                                         Michal Kubecek

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html