[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131210104443.GK32155@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:44:43 +0000
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xen-netback: fix abuse of napi budget
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:37:36AM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:30:13AM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 10/12/13 10:25, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 10:16 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > >> netback seemed to be somewhat confused about the napi budget parameter and
> > >> basically ignored it. This patch fixes that, properly limiting the work done
> > >> in each poll.
> > >
> > > What do you mean "ignored", xenvif_tx_submit seems to be tracking and
> > > testing work_done against the budget.
> >
> > I have seen this warning in net_rx_action() trigger.
> >
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(work > weight);
> >
> > Which means netback wasn't limiting the work done.
> >
>
> But in the original code work_done is returned by xenvif_tx_submit which
> has guard against that situation, right?
>
And now I think I spot a bug...
work_done = xenvif_tx_submit(vif, nr_gops);
The second argument should really be "budget". :-(
Wei.
> Wei.
>
> > David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists