netdev - Re: Fwd: UDP/IPv6 performance issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52A749CB.1010909@hp.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:05:15 -0800
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	ajay seshadri <seshajay@...il.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: UDP/IPv6 performance issue

If you want to compare the "fundamental" path length difference between 
IPv4 and IPv6, without any concerns about stateless offloads like CKO or 
GRO et al, you could use something like a single-byte netperf TCP_RR test.

netperf -c -C -H <remote> -t TCP_RR

and then compare service demands between the two cases.   You can add a 
"-i 30,3" to have netperf run several iterations to get a better idea of 
how close it is to the "real" mean result.

happy benchmarking,

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html