[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1386695522.30495.349.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:12:02 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v5] xen-netback: fix fragment detection
in checksum setup
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 16:24 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Yes, I guess that's true but if we decide to pull up at all then is it harmful to pull more than we absolutely need?
Pulling too many bytes might hurt aggregation.
When one skb is merged to another one (skb_try_coalesce()), if you have
payload in skb->head, we cannot free the head, and need one additional
'frag'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists