netdev - Re: Fwd: UDP/IPv6 performance issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:24:02 -0800
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	ajay seshadri <seshajay@...il.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: UDP/IPv6 performance issue

On 12/10/2013 09:05 AM, Rick Jones wrote:
> If you want to compare the "fundamental" path length difference between
> IPv4 and IPv6, without any concerns about stateless offloads like CKO or
> GRO et al, you could use something like a single-byte netperf TCP_RR test.
>
> netperf -c -C -H <remote> -t TCP_RR

Or UDP_RR, since that is your usage case...

rick

>
> and then compare service demands between the two cases.   You can add a
> "-i 30,3" to have netperf run several iterations to get a better idea of
> how close it is to the "real" mean result.
>
> happy benchmarking,
>
> rick jones
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html