[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131211191023.GA4675@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:10:23 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ipv6: router reachability probing
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 01:48:20PM +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
> RFC 4191 states in 3.5:
>
> When a host avoids using any non-reachable router X and instead sends
> a data packet to another router Y, and the host would have used
> router X if router X were reachable, then the host SHOULD probe each
> such router X's reachability by sending a single Neighbor
> Solicitation to that router's address. A host MUST NOT probe a
> router's reachability in the absence of useful traffic that the host
> would have sent to the router if it were reachable. In any case,
> these probes MUST be rate-limited to no more than one per minute per
> router.
>
> Currently, when the neighbour corresponding to a router falls into
> NUD_FAILED, it's never considered again. Introduce a new rt6_nud_state
> value, RT6_NUD_FAIL_PROBE, which suggests the route should not be used but
> should be probed with a single NS. The probe is ratelimited by the existing
> code. To better distinguish meanings of the failure values, rename
> RT6_NUD_FAIL_SOFT to RT6_NUD_FAIL_DO_RR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Looks good, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists