[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1386790638.30495.379.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:37:18 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "H.K. Jerry Chu" <hkchu@...gle.com>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net-gro: Prepare GRO stack for the upcoming
tunneling support
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 11:04 -0800, H.K. Jerry Chu wrote:
> -int tcp_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +int __tcp_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcphdr *th)
> {
> - struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
> -
> - skb->csum_start = skb_transport_header(skb) - skb->head;
> + skb->csum_start = (unsigned char *)th - skb->head;
> skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct tcphdr, check);
> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
>
> @@ -251,6 +250,12 @@ int tcp_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__tcp_gro_complete);
> +
> +int tcp_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + return __tcp_gro_complete(skb, tcp_hdr(skb));
> +}
I have no idea why you kept this change.
As we said, the transport offset is set, so it looks like a lot of your
changes can be removed to ease the review
tcp_gro_receive() sets the transport header, so the xxx_complete()
handlers can rely on it.
The only part that you could keep is the following optim :
- skb->csum_start = skb_transport_header(skb) - skb->head;
+ skb->csum_start = (unsigned char *)th - skb->head;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists