[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52A7F176.7040109@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:00:38 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 3/11] bonding: rebuild the lock use for bond_alb_monitor()
The bond_alb_monitor use bond lock to protect the bond slave list,
it is no effect here, we need to use RTNL or RCU to replace bond lock,
the bond_alb_monitor will called 10 times one second, RTNL may loss
performance here, so I replace bond lock with RCU to protect the
bond slave list, also the RTNL is preserved, the logic of the monitor
did not changed.
Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index 1fae915..8a85064 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static void rlb_rebalance(struct bonding *bond)
for (; hash_index != RLB_NULL_INDEX;
hash_index = client_info->used_next) {
client_info = &(bond_info->rx_hashtbl[hash_index]);
- assigned_slave = rlb_next_rx_slave(bond);
+ assigned_slave = __rlb_next_rx_slave(bond);
if (assigned_slave && (client_info->slave != assigned_slave)) {
client_info->slave = assigned_slave;
client_info->ntt = 1;
@@ -1495,14 +1495,14 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
struct list_head *iter;
struct slave *slave;
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
-
if (!bond_has_slaves(bond)) {
bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter = 0;
bond_info->lp_counter = 0;
goto re_arm;
}
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter++;
bond_info->lp_counter++;
@@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
*/
read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
- bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter)
+ bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter)
alb_send_learning_packets(slave, slave->dev->dev_addr);
read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
@@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
- bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
+ bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
tlb_clear_slave(bond, slave, 1);
if (slave == bond->curr_active_slave) {
SLAVE_TLB_INFO(slave).load =
@@ -1552,11 +1552,9 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
* dev_set_promiscuity requires rtnl and
* nothing else. Avoid race with bond_close.
*/
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
- if (!rtnl_trylock()) {
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (!rtnl_trylock())
goto re_arm;
- }
bond_info->rlb_promisc_timeout_counter = 0;
@@ -1568,7 +1566,7 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
bond_info->primary_is_promisc = 0;
rtnl_unlock();
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
}
if (bond_info->rlb_rebalance) {
@@ -1590,11 +1588,9 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
}
}
}
-
+ rcu_read_unlock();
re_arm:
queue_delayed_work(bond->wq, &bond->alb_work, alb_delta_in_ticks);
-
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
}
/* assumption: called before the slave is attached to the bond
--
1.8.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists