[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1386876523.19078.93.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:28:43 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>,
Van Jacobson <vanj@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] tcp: remove a bogus TSO split
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
While investigating performance problems on small RPC workloads,
I noticed linux TCP stack was always splitting the last TSO skb
into two parts (skbs). One being a multiple of MSS, and a small one
with the Push flag. This split is done even if TCP_NODELAY is set.
Example with request/response of 4K/4K
IP A > B: . ack 68432 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6524593 6525001>
IP A > B: . 65537:68433(2896) ack 69632 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6524593 6525001>
IP A > B: P 68433:69633(1200) ack 69632 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6524593 6525001>
IP B > A: . ack 68433 win 2768 <nop,nop,timestamp 6525001 6524593>
IP B > A: . 69632:72528(2896) ack 69633 win 2768 <nop,nop,timestamp 6525001 6524593>
IP B > A: P 72528:73728(1200) ack 69633 win 2768 <nop,nop,timestamp 6525001 6524593>
IP A > B: . ack 72528 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6524593 6525001>
IP A > B: . 69633:72529(2896) ack 73728 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6524593 6525001>
IP A > B: P 72529:73729(1200) ack 73728 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6524593 6525001>
We think this is not needed.
All the Nagle/window tests are done at this point.
This patch tremendously improves performance, as the traffic now looks
like :
IP A > B: . ack 98304 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834277 6834685>
IP A > B: P 94209:98305(4096) ack 98304 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834277 6834685>
IP B > A: . ack 98305 win 2768 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834686 6834277>
IP B > A: P 98304:102400(4096) ack 98305 win 2768 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834686 6834277>
IP A > B: . ack 102400 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834279 6834686>
IP A > B: P 98305:102401(4096) ack 102400 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834279 6834686>
IP B > A: . ack 102401 win 2768 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834687 6834279>
IP B > A: P 102400:106496(4096) ack 102401 win 2768 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834687 6834279>
IP A > B: . ack 106496 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834280 6834687>
IP A > B: P 102401:106497(4096) ack 106496 win 2783 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834280 6834687>
IP B > A: . ack 106497 win 2768 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834688 6834280>
IP B > A: P 106496:110592(4096) ack 106497 win 2768 <nop,nop,timestamp 6834688 6834280>
Before :
lpq83:~# nstat >/dev/null;perf stat ./super_netperf 200 -t TCP_RR -H lpq84 -l 20 -- -r 4K,4K
280774
Performance counter stats for './super_netperf 200 -t TCP_RR -H lpq84 -l 20 -- -r 4K,4K':
205719.049006 task-clock # 9.278 CPUs utilized
8,449,968 context-switches # 0.041 M/sec
1,935,997 CPU-migrations # 0.009 M/sec
160,541 page-faults # 0.780 K/sec
548,478,722,290 cycles # 2.666 GHz [83.20%]
455,240,670,857 stalled-cycles-frontend # 83.00% frontend cycles idle [83.48%]
272,881,454,275 stalled-cycles-backend # 49.75% backend cycles idle [66.73%]
166,091,460,030 instructions # 0.30 insns per cycle
# 2.74 stalled cycles per insn [83.39%]
29,150,229,399 branches # 141.699 M/sec [83.30%]
1,943,814,026 branch-misses # 6.67% of all branches [83.32%]
22.173517844 seconds time elapsed
lpq83:~# nstat | egrep "IpOutRequests|IpExtOutOctets"
IpOutRequests 16851063 0.0
IpExtOutOctets 23878580777 0.0
After patch :
lpq83:~# nstat >/dev/null;perf stat ./super_netperf 200 -t TCP_RR -H lpq84 -l 20 -- -r 4K,4K
280877
Performance counter stats for './super_netperf 200 -t TCP_RR -H lpq84 -l 20 -- -r 4K,4K':
107496.071918 task-clock # 4.847 CPUs utilized
5,635,458 context-switches # 0.052 M/sec
1,374,707 CPU-migrations # 0.013 M/sec
160,920 page-faults # 0.001 M/sec
281,500,010,924 cycles # 2.619 GHz [83.28%]
228,865,069,307 stalled-cycles-frontend # 81.30% frontend cycles idle [83.38%]
142,462,742,658 stalled-cycles-backend # 50.61% backend cycles idle [66.81%]
95,227,712,566 instructions # 0.34 insns per cycle
# 2.40 stalled cycles per insn [83.43%]
16,209,868,171 branches # 150.795 M/sec [83.20%]
874,252,952 branch-misses # 5.39% of all branches [83.37%]
22.175821286 seconds time elapsed
lpq83:~# nstat | egrep "IpOutRequests|IpExtOutOctets"
IpOutRequests 11239428 0.0
IpExtOutOctets 23595191035 0.0
Indeed, the occupancy of tx skbs (IpExtOutOctets/IpOutRequests) is higher :
2099 instead of 1417, thus helping GRO to be more efficient when using FQ packet
scheduler.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>
Cc: Van Jacobson <vanj@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 2a69f42e51ca..335e110e86ba 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -1410,10 +1410,7 @@ static unsigned int tcp_mss_split_point(const struct sock *sk, const struct sk_b
needed = min(skb->len, window);
- if (max_len <= needed)
- return max_len;
-
- return needed - needed % mss_now;
+ return min(max_len, needed);
}
/* Can at least one segment of SKB be sent right now, according to the
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists