[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1387132204.19078.199.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:30:04 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: sbohrer@...advisors.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp: ipv4: must add synchronization in
udp_sk_rx_dst_set()
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 20:22 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:46:51 -0800
>
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >
> > Unlike TCP, UDP input path does not hold the socket lock.
> >
> > Before messing with sk->sk_rx_dst, we must use a spinlock, otherwise
> > multiple cpus could leak a refcount.
> >
> > This patch also takes care of renewing a stale dst entry.
> > (When the sk->sk_rx_dst would not be used by IP early demux)
> >
> > Fixes: 421b3885bf6d ("udp: ipv4: Add udp early demux")
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> Applied.
>
> Longterm, perhaps a candidate for using xchg() instead of this
> spinlock?
Indeed... It appears sk_dst_lock should not be used from BH context
anyway...
I am sending a fix, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists