[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1387133626.19078.216.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:53:46 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] udp: ipv4: do not use sk_dst_lock from softirq context
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Using sk_dst_lock from softirq context is not supported right now.
Instead of adding BH protection everywhere,
udp_sk_rx_dst_set() can instead use xchg(), as suggested
by David.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Fixes: 975022310233 ("udp: ipv4: must add synchronization in udp_sk_rx_dst_set()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/udp.c | 13 ++++---------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 62c19fdd102d..f140048334ce 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1600,20 +1600,15 @@ static void flush_stack(struct sock **stack, unsigned int count,
}
/* For TCP sockets, sk_rx_dst is protected by socket lock
- * For UDP, we use sk_dst_lock to guard against concurrent changes.
+ * For UDP, we use xchg() to guard against concurrent changes.
*/
static void udp_sk_rx_dst_set(struct sock *sk, struct dst_entry *dst)
{
struct dst_entry *old;
- spin_lock(&sk->sk_dst_lock);
- old = sk->sk_rx_dst;
- if (likely(old != dst)) {
- dst_hold(dst);
- sk->sk_rx_dst = dst;
- dst_release(old);
- }
- spin_unlock(&sk->sk_dst_lock);
+ dst_hold(dst);
+ old = xchg(&sk->sk_rx_dst, dst);
+ dst_release(old);
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists