[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B0A208.4030103@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:12:08 -0500
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 7/9] bridge: Properly check if local fdb entry
can be deleted in br_fdb_delete_by_port
On 12/17/2013 07:03 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> br_fdb_delete_by_port() doesn't care about vlan and mac address of the
> bridge device.
>
> As the check is almost the same as mac address changing, slightly modify
> fdb_delete_local() and use it.
>
> Note:
> - We change the dst of a local entry when the same address is found.
> This occurs in the case kernel has inserted the same address for another
> port but has failed due to dup. We can regard changing dst as deleting
> old one and inserting new one that should have been added by the dup
> port, so we can always set its added_by_user to 0 in fdb_delete_local().
I disagree. What happens if the user tries add a duplicate fdb with
the local bit set? That is permitted and in fact a default because in
iproute right now. That fdb should persist until the port is removed or
user removes the fdb.
added_by_user flag should only be changed in the netlink code since the
user has full control of it.
-vlad
>
> - This is a slight change in behavior where the bridge device can receive
> the traffic to the old address during the short window between calling
> del_nbp() and br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id() in br_del_if(). However,
> it is not a problem because we still have the address on the bridge device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
> index 817f138..bd43cb1 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ static void fdb_delete_local(struct net_bridge *br,
> if (op != p && ether_addr_equal(op->dev->dev_addr, addr) &&
> (!vid || nbp_vlan_find(op, vid))) {
> f->dst = op;
> + f->added_by_user = 0;
> return;
> }
> }
> @@ -111,6 +112,7 @@ static void fdb_delete_local(struct net_bridge *br,
> if (p && ether_addr_equal(br->dev->dev_addr, addr) &&
> (!vid || br_vlan_find(br, vid))) {
> f->dst = NULL;
> + f->added_by_user = 0;
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -261,26 +263,11 @@ void br_fdb_delete_by_port(struct net_bridge *br,
>
> if (f->is_static && !do_all)
> continue;
> - /*
> - * if multiple ports all have the same device address
> - * then when one port is deleted, assign
> - * the local entry to other port
> - */
> - if (f->is_local) {
> - struct net_bridge_port *op;
> - list_for_each_entry(op, &br->port_list, list) {
> - if (op != p &&
> - ether_addr_equal(op->dev->dev_addr,
> - f->addr.addr)) {
> - f->dst = op;
> - f->added_by_user = 0;
> - goto skip_delete;
> - }
> - }
> - }
>
> - fdb_delete(br, f);
> - skip_delete: ;
> + if (f->is_local)
> + fdb_delete_local(br, p, f);
> + else
> + fdb_delete(br, f);
> }
> }
> spin_unlock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists