[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131218075924.GE27460@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:59:24 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: RongQing Li <roy.qing.li@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: clear RTF_EXPIRES when call ip6_rt_copy
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 08:48:04AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 09:48 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:46:24PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> >> The from of new cloned rt should not be set if it's impossible for the ort
> >> to be expired.
> >
> > Actually, why do you think so? What could go wrong?
> >
>
> I just don't want rt6_check_expired to check some impossible expired routes.
Only for performance? It does not seem to do any harm?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists