netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] net_sched: mirred: remove action when the target device is gone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52B1FC6D.7040005@mojatatu.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:50:05 -0500
From:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] net_sched: mirred: remove action when
 the target device is gone

On 12/18/13 13:36, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>> On 12/15/13 23:15, Cong Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> When the target device is removed, the mirred action is
>>> still there but with the dev pointer setting to NULL.
>>> This makes the output from 'tc filter' ugly. There is no
>>> reason to keep it.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry - this one i have problems with.
>> actions may be referenced from multiple filters,
>> you cant just delete it (that would leave other users
>> pointing to it dangling). Destroying would eventually
>> delete it when the refcount goes to 0.
>
> How? tcf_action_init() always allocates a new action,
> it doesn't even look for an existing one.
>


tc action blah index 123
tc action filter goo action blah index 123
tc action filter gah action blah index 123

Very useful for example for multiple flows to
share the same policer.


>> [And when we delete actions we send netlink events to announce
>> that]. The proper solution would require i.e tag it as to be
>> deleted and implement some form of garbage collection.
>
> It doesn't worth to have a GC for this...
>
> Even if what you said is true, we should just make a copy
> for each of the filters. I just tried to create two different filters
> with same and different mirred actions, my patch works
> perfectly.
>

A copy wont work. We want sharing.

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html