netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 ipsec-next] xfrm: Namespacify xfrm_policy_sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <slrnlb2cuh.32c.xiyou.wangcong@linux-6brj.site>
Date:	Wed, 18 Dec 2013 05:33:58 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 ipsec-next] xfrm: Namespacify xfrm_policy_sk_bundles

On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 at 04:50 GMT, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 11:34 +0800, Fan Du wrote:
>> -
>> -			spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_sk_bundle_lock);
>> -			xdst->u.dst.next = xfrm_policy_sk_bundles;
>> -			xfrm_policy_sk_bundles = &xdst->u.dst;
>> -			spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_sk_bundle_lock);
>> -
>> +			xdst->u.dst.next = xchg(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_sk_bundles,
>> +						&xdst->u.dst);
>
> This is not safe.
>
> Take a look at include/linux/llist.h if you really want to avoid the
> spinlock.
>

Exactly, xfrm_policy_sk_bundles list is only traversed after deletion.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html