netdev - [net 2/5] e1000e: fix compiler warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1387351186-23389-3-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Dec 2013 23:19:43 -0800
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	David Ertman <davidx.m.ertman@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net 2/5] e1000e: fix compiler warnings

From: David Ertman <davidx.m.ertman@...el.com>

This patch is to fix a compiler warning of __bad_udelay due to a value
of >999 being passed as a parameter to udelay() in the function
e1000e_phy_has_link_generic().  This affects the gcc compiler when
it is given a flag of -O3 and the icc compiler.

This patch is also making the change from mdelay() to msleep() in the
same function, since it was determined though code inspection that this
function is never called in atomic context.

Signed-off-by: David Ertman <davidx.m.ertman@...el.com>
Acked-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
index da2be59..20e71f4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
@@ -1757,19 +1757,23 @@ s32 e1000e_phy_has_link_generic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 iterations,
 		 * it across the board.
 		 */
 		ret_val = e1e_rphy(hw, MII_BMSR, &phy_status);
-		if (ret_val)
+		if (ret_val) {
 			/* If the first read fails, another entity may have
 			 * ownership of the resources, wait and try again to
 			 * see if they have relinquished the resources yet.
 			 */
-			udelay(usec_interval);
+			if (usec_interval >= 1000)
+				msleep(usec_interval / 1000);
+			else
+				udelay(usec_interval);
+		}
 		ret_val = e1e_rphy(hw, MII_BMSR, &phy_status);
 		if (ret_val)
 			break;
 		if (phy_status & BMSR_LSTATUS)
 			break;
 		if (usec_interval >= 1000)
-			mdelay(usec_interval / 1000);
+			msleep(usec_interval / 1000);
 		else
 			udelay(usec_interval);
 	}
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html