netdev - [RFC PATCH] ixgbe: acquire RCU read lock when calling netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1387432860-14021-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:00:56 +0800
From:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
	Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
	Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
	Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
	Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
	John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ixgbe: acquire RCU read lock when calling netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu()

According to documentation for netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(),
caller should take RCU read lock, otherwise it will trigger following
warnings. The simplest fix is to protect with rcu_read_lock()/
rcu_read_unlock(). And this solutions passes basic tests.

Otherwise we may need to introduce  netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev()
as netdev_lower_get_next_private(), which assumes the caller has
gained the lock to protect the list.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index cc06854..da72a5f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -4336,6 +4336,7 @@ static void ixgbe_configure_dfwd(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
 	struct list_head *iter;
 	int err;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev, upper, iter) {
 		if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
 			struct macvlan_dev *dfwd = netdev_priv(upper);
@@ -4348,6 +4349,7 @@ static void ixgbe_configure_dfwd(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
 			}
 		}
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static void ixgbe_configure(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
@@ -4601,6 +4603,7 @@ static void ixgbe_up_complete(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
 	netif_tx_start_all_queues(adapter->netdev);
 
 	/* enable any upper devices */
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev, upper, iter) {
 		if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
 			struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(upper);
@@ -4609,6 +4612,7 @@ static void ixgbe_up_complete(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
 				netif_tx_start_all_queues(upper);
 		}
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	/* bring the link up in the watchdog, this could race with our first
 	 * link up interrupt but shouldn't be a problem */
@@ -4803,6 +4807,7 @@ void ixgbe_down(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
 	netif_tx_disable(netdev);
 
 	/* disable any upper devices */
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev, upper, iter) {
 		if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
 			struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(upper);
@@ -4814,6 +4819,7 @@ void ixgbe_down(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
 			}
 		}
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	ixgbe_irq_disable(adapter);
 
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html