netdev - Re: [PATCH] can: ti_hecc: Use the OMAP2PLUS dependency for omap2plus devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131220125236.GA26648@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:52:37 -0300
From:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: ti_hecc: Use the OMAP2PLUS dependency for omap2plus
 devices

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 01:35:58PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 12/20/2013 01:21 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > OMAP's ti_hecc driver is used to support the CAN controller on many
> > omap2plus SoCs (OMAP2430, OMAP3, OMAP4, OMAP5 and AM335x).
> > Constrain the driver to OMAP2PLUS, which is the super-set of all the
> > other SoCs variants.
> 
> Why not enable it for all ARM platforms to get a bigger compile coverage?
> 

Hm.. Isn't the COMPILE_TEST option for getting compile coverage?

If the IP is only available on OMAP SoCs, it makes sense to only allow
building it there, but I don't really have a strong opinion.
-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html