lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:01:38 +0100
From:	Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@...i.com>
To:	"fugang.duan@...escale.com" <fugang.duan@...escale.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	"Fabio.Estevam@...escale.com" <Fabio.Estevam@...escale.com>,
	"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
	"Frank.Li@...escale.com" <Frank.Li@...escale.com>,
	"bhutchings@...arflare.com" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: FEC performance degradation with certain packet sizes

Dear Andy,

On 12/20/2013 04:35 AM, fugang.duan@...escale.com wrote:
> [...]
>
> I can reproduce the issue on imx6q/dl platform with freescale internal kernel tree.
>
> This issue must be related to cpufreq, when set scaling_governor to performance:
> echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
>
> And then do NPtcp test, the result as below:
>
>   24:      99 bytes      5 times -->      9.89 Mbps in      76.40 usec
>   25:     125 bytes      5 times -->     12.10 Mbps in      78.80 usec
>   26:     128 bytes      5 times -->     12.27 Mbps in      79.60 usec
>   27:     131 bytes      5 times -->     12.80 Mbps in      78.10 usec
>   28:     189 bytes      5 times -->     18.00 Mbps in      80.10 usec
>   29:     192 bytes      5 times -->     18.31 Mbps in      80.00 usec
>   30:     195 bytes      5 times -->     18.41 Mbps in      80.80 usec
>   31:     253 bytes      5 times -->     23.34 Mbps in      82.70 usec
>   32:     256 bytes      5 times -->     23.91 Mbps in      81.70 usec
>   33:     259 bytes      5 times -->     24.19 Mbps in      81.70 usec
>   34:     381 bytes      5 times -->     33.18 Mbps in      87.60 usec
>   35:     384 bytes      5 times -->     33.87 Mbps in      86.50 usec
>   36:     387 bytes      5 times -->     34.41 Mbps in      85.80 usec
>   37:     509 bytes      5 times -->     42.72 Mbps in      90.90 usec
>   38:     512 bytes      5 times -->     42.60 Mbps in      91.70 usec
>   39:     515 bytes      5 times -->     42.80 Mbps in      91.80 usec
>   40:     765 bytes      5 times -->     56.45 Mbps in     103.40 usec
>   41:     768 bytes      5 times -->     57.11 Mbps in     102.60 usec
>   42:     771 bytes      5 times -->     57.22 Mbps in     102.80 usec
>   43:    1021 bytes      5 times -->     70.69 Mbps in     110.20 usec
>   44:    1024 bytes      5 times -->     70.70 Mbps in     110.50 usec
>   45:    1027 bytes      5 times -->     69.59 Mbps in     112.60 usec
>   46:    1533 bytes      5 times -->     73.56 Mbps in     159.00 usec
>   47:    1536 bytes      5 times -->     72.92 Mbps in     160.70 usec
>   48:    1539 bytes      5 times -->     73.80 Mbps in     159.10 usec
>   49:    2045 bytes      5 times -->     93.59 Mbps in     166.70 usec
>   50:    2048 bytes      5 times -->     94.07 Mbps in     166.10 usec
>   51:    2051 bytes      5 times -->     92.92 Mbps in     168.40 usec
>   52:    3069 bytes      5 times -->    123.43 Mbps in     189.70 usec
>   53:    3072 bytes      5 times -->    123.68 Mbps in     189.50 usec

You are right. Unfortunately, this does not work on i.MX28 (at least for me). Couldn't 
it be that the cpufreq is masking the problem on the i.MX6?

Best regards,
--
Hector Palacios
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ