netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] can: ti_hecc: Replace platform dependency with ARM dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:33:42 -0300
From:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] can: ti_hecc: Replace platform dependency with ARM
 dependency

On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:17:27AM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 12/20/2013 11:14 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> 
> > OMAP's ti_hecc driver is used to support the CAN controller on many omap2plus
> > SoCs (OMAP2430, OMAP3, OMAP4, OMAP5 and AM335x), so it's wrong to make this
> > depend on OMAP3 only. Take an extra step, to get wider build coverage, and make
> > the driver depend on ARM.
> 
>     To have a real wide coverage, it's probably worth adding '|| COMIPLE_TEXT' 
> to 'depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS'?
> 

Yup, and that was my exact proposal on my reply to v1 (which I forgot to detail
in v2). I'd say it's Marc's call.
-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html