lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpX69N+Gyf7Wz0pBE4SWiQuqCDgnCqeA2OO4BFdCp17gxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:07:27 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net_sched: optimize tcf_match_indev()

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> You lost me.
> You said you were running all those tests and didnt see any
> bugs. I said if infact you ran exactly what you said you test
> did before and after your changes you will see obvious bugs.
>

I said I never triggered Eric's crash with `tc action ls ...`, nor
with any of my other test case.

And I also said I added 'tc action ls...' _after_ David merged it,
so failed to notice the difference.

Clear?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ