netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 5/9] bridge: Fix the way to check if a local fdb entry can be deleted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1387526576.3475.5.camel@ubuntu-vm-makita>
Date:	Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:02:56 +0900
From:	Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:	vyasevic@...hat.com, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 5/9] bridge: Fix the way to check if a local fdb
 entry can be deleted

On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 09:39 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
...
> Could we make up as set of test case scripts to validate these changes.
> Now that FDB table can be manipulated by iproute tools, should be possible
> to have set of cases for validation.

Thank you for your suggestion.
Maybe is it enough to make some test of port attach/detach and confirm
that data/control plane doesn't result in any inconsistency or odd
situation by tcpdump/bridge commands?

Thanks,
Toshiaki Makita

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html