[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1387600744-11366-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 05:39:04 +0100
From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
To: Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
werner@...esberger.net, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] nfs: fix dead code of ipv6_addr_scope
The correct way to check on IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL is to check with
the ipv6_addr_src_scope function.
Currently this can't be work, because ipv6_addr_scope returns a int with
a mask of IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_MASK (0x00f0U) and IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL
is 0x02. So the condition is always false.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
---
I think ipv6_addr_src_scope should be correct, can somebody from netdev ml
confirm this please?
I stumple over that and I did not compile and test it. Maybe this is something
for stable?
fs/nfs/nfs4filelayoutdev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayoutdev.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayoutdev.c
index c7c295e5..efac602 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayoutdev.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayoutdev.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ same_sockaddr(struct sockaddr *addr1, struct sockaddr *addr2)
b6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)addr2;
/* LINKLOCAL addresses must have matching scope_id */
- if (ipv6_addr_scope(&a6->sin6_addr) ==
+ if (ipv6_addr_src_scope(&a6->sin6_addr) ==
IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL &&
a6->sin6_scope_id != b6->sin6_scope_id)
return false;
--
1.8.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists