netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] net_sched: optimize tcf_match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXXD0rHiYxGvXiN7G8BtVdTQV6Xixma6BENoZ5SZ2XjZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Dec 2013 11:33:19 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net_sched: optimize tcf_match_indev()

On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> On 12/21/13 16:09, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>>
>> On 12/20/13 18:49, Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>>> Jamal, any comments on this patch itself?
>>>
>>
>> I think the idea is good. Sorry havent paid close
>> attention - starting to look at what is already
>> in net-next. I could pass you a test or two to run
>> for this change...
>>
>
>
> BTW: This indev feature was supposed to be "temporary";->
> but has stuck around all these years. Not sure how widely it is

I knew, ematch does much better. :)
But once you added an API, it is hard to remove it...

> used. I will send you a testcase shortly. If it passes for you
> please add my ACKed-by
>

Will do.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html