netdev - Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: Fix potential incorrect call for udelay()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131223112637.46ae42e3@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:26:37 +0000
From:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Libin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
Cc:	<davem@...emloft.net>, <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <tedheadster@...il.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: Fix potential incorrect call for udelay()

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:33:44 +0800
Libin <huawei.libin@...wei.com> wrote:

> From: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
> 
> The variable delay_time as a module parameter can be set a value
> exceeding the limit of the udelay function. This patch checks the
> delay_time value to select mdelay() or udelay().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>

Nobody should need to set a delay time that long, so this seems a rather
surplus check.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html