netdev - Re: [PATCH 19/21] wireless: slight optimization of addr compare

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52B8452F.4070508@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:14:07 +0800
From:	Ding Tianhong <dthxman@...il.com>
To:	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
	Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/21] wireless: slight optimization of addr compare

于 2013/12/23 21:47, Felix Fietkau 写道:
> On 2013-12-23 06:11, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Use the recently added and possibly more efficient
>> ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp.
> It looks to me like all of these (including the ones in the other
> similar patches) are in places, where the address data is aligned to at
> least 16 bit. Because of this, using ether_addr_equal instead of
> ether_addr_equal_unaligned would be much better for platforms without
> CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
> 
> - Felix

Yes, the most of the place should use ether_addr_equal. thanks.

Regards
Ding

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html